« Backsliding vs. Freefalling | Main | Victory to the Fat Men »

Second Worst Government

Prime Minister Yanukovych is a better option than new elections

Yushchenko is currently refusing to acknowledge the new coalition and has threatened to dissolve the Parliament. BYT and NU deputies are using the same kinds of disruptive tactics RoU was using until last Friday. Protesters are in the streets, and some, like BYT are calling for new election.

Are these the right moves?

No. First because NU and the SPU have already destroyed the Orange coalition: it's gone. Attempts to try and bring it back will not succeed, and so there is no use in carrying on. The Party of Regions was able to use it's noise as a filibuster until it could reach a deal with the Socialists. NU and BYT don't even seem to be trying to win them back, so of what use is the agitation?

Take yet one more step back: the thing that was supposed to unite the economic liberals and conservatives in the orange coalition was supposed to be fighting corruption. It's pretty clear that it didn't and would not have in the future. What other cause should bring Ukrainians out in support of them?

Maxed Out On Political Promises

Even assuming there were a chance of bringing back the Orange coalition, neither new elections nor protests will help.

It's possible, in watching the distasteful display in Parliament these days, to forget about the even less tasteful parties that were swept out in the last election: Vitrenko's band, the Ne Takers (the only party with a less competent campaign than NU), and all the contenders on technicalities (two dozen of them!). It would have been nice if Pora had made the cut, but not nice enough to go through the whole mess again. Remember what it cost to eliminate the deadwood deputies: four months of political posturing, allegations, and smear. All this while deputies were too chicken to make any major decisions and problems became crises. Ukrainians should not be forced to endure another four months of this for the privilege of possibly seeing deadwood bob up in Parliament again.

Beyond this, the last election was free and fair: a procedural triumph at the very least. Will the next one be as fair when held under extraordinary circumstances and probably in a rush?

Now about the protests. For starters, read Foreign Notes:

There are tents cities going up from PORA and others but PR has them too. If there’s a call for protests now, what will it be for? Corruption? After the allegations that accompanied the dismissal of Poroshenko and Tymoshenko? People think that Our Ukraine is as corrupt as RoU... So what we would be left with is a call for protests over what amounts to political differences. "Come out and protest their forming a different coalition!" To paraphrase a quote from a movie, that’s a helluva a concept to have men die for. It just ain’t gonna work.

The Orange Revolution had a real, tangible goal. It was against documented illegal activity. And it was a grassroots effort, much more against political corruption than it was for Yushchenko, as I've always said.

Current protests are just gatherings of angry people lead by politicians. The result? Viktor Taran of BYT scaring off RoU deputies by firing rubber bullets in the air. And Oleh Kalashnikov of PoR one-upped him by assaulting a journalist, destroying the tape in his camera, lying and saying it never happened, then saying he was "provoked".

The OR camps were up two months without violent incident: these new ones obviously don't have the same heart.

The Deal

The PoR-CPU-SPU coalition is likely to be corrupt, backsliding, and anti-democratic. Here's what else it might be:

If the NU people do their messy deals with RoU, they may be able to leverage out the Communists in the process. That would be a big step towards having a government with at least a little common sense. Distasteful compromise like this might even bring enough sense to the government to deal with the host of inefficiencies in the economy (as described in this IMF paper).

NU, BYT and supporters of the former orange parties might as well let Yanukovych try to fulfill his promise to sort out the gas crisis. No way to lose, just consider the possible outcomes:

  1. The Russian government takes the principled position that Russia should be selling gas to Ukraine openly at market rates - good policy which moves Ukrainian-Russian relations in a positive direction, good for forcing Ukrainian development along a sustainable route, good for reinforcing Ukrainian independence, and damaging to Yanukovych's credibility.
  2. The Russian government inks an old Belarus-style cut-rate deal, Ukrainians pay less for gas, and we at least have more confirmation about how things really work in the neighbor to the north.
  3. Actually, I'll amend that. It could be bad if Yanukovych sells off Ukrainian gas infrastructure in a fire sale, but one would expect that to tank his political career. This tends to dissuade rational politicians, unlike Yushchenko's party which is trying to give over control of the gas pipes, excuse me, "temporary joint control" of the pipes, to Gazprom. It's almost pathologically self destructive: Yushchenko is expending every effort to keep Yanukovych out of office just long enough for his people to forfeit control over a tremendous amount of Ukrainian infrastructure. The RoU-Reds can't do worse.

Letting the coalition stand also gives Ukraine a chance of getting into the WTO ahead of Russia (which may be getting closer, see this EDM article). If the only sound in the Rada is coming from noiseblowers, no progress will be possible. This is a time-sensitive issue: if Russia gains membership, and thus veto power, Ukraine's task will become exponentially more difficult.

Finally, there is at least a chance Ukraine can get a damn Constitutional Court. It's been over a year without any legal way to determine constitutionality. This has already complicated dozens of messes.

88591-393652-thumbnail.jpg
Lutsenko doesn't want to be a part of the Anti-Crisis Cabinet
For these reasons, the neglect that will result from four months of non-government and the potential problems resulting from new elections are even worse than a PoR-CPU-SPU Cabinet. There is going to be corruption, the oligarchs will keep their power, and little progress is likely over the next five years. But the majorities in NU and the Socialists, by courting PoR, have already demonstrated that they didn't have the will to do otherwise.

What remains for Ukrainians interested in the democratic and economic development of their nation is only to try and support the deputies that behave least reprehensibly.

Lutsenko and Tymoshenko are looking good this week. [image - Axis]

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (20)

I have more hope for grass roots movements within Ukraine. I also think that increased int'l economic contacts/funds and popular memories of the Orange Revolution will prevent things from backsliding completely....

Here are some sites that provide current news on Ukraine.

www.ukrainebulletin.org
(evangelical ministries in Ukraine and current events and cultural issues in Ukraine.)
www.readministries.com
Reports on evangelical seminaries, Bible colleges and (protestant) churches of Ukraine, with focus on how READ MINISTRIES will supply literature and other resources to facilitate training.
www.loveliftforukraine.org
news about sister church relationships and other Ukraine ministries of the Minnesota Baptist Conference.

www.shepherdsfoundation.org
update on ministries

dlw
July 16, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterdlw
The Orange Revolution had a real, tangible goal - a 'legal' regime change, an unconstitutional transfer of power, and a geopolotical redrawing of Eastern Europe.
July 17, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterLalulu
My prediction:
Coalition-in fact.
There will be no formal coalition between Yush and Yanu because it is too unpalatable politically, but IN FACT there will be cooperation between them because each recognizes that they represent different segments of society that must get along somehow if the nation is to survive.
In this, BYuT will actually be in real opposition, but that will be OK with everyone, especially Yush, because it is a safety valve for pent-up Orange frustrations.
July 18, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterWRY
If OU and ByuT can form an effective opposition in the Rada it is a victory for Democracy, even though Regions will be in control of the body.
If we went to new elections simply on the grounds that we didn't like the anti-crisis coalition, what that would be saying is that you simply re-rig things until you get the result you had decided to get in the first place. It would cause the Blue supporters - who knows, maybe the world as well - to then look backward on the Orange Revolution re-vote as simply a past example of that same principle, rather than as a just solution to an electoral fraud.
I think Ukraine is at a crossroads: we either have a fuinctioning parliament that has majority and opposition, or else we go down the road that leads to the shelling of parliament a la Yeltsin in Russia.
People fear that Yanu is going to be a Lukashenko and I have myself expressed that fear. But the true spirit of the Maidan should be the country's guarantee that that cannot happen. That spirit, the determination to say no to Kuchma-ism, will not die.
July 18, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterWRY
Lalulu: What OR are you referring to? Nothing of what you are stating was on the minds of the people who crowded the Maidan in protest, day after day, night after night. Why are you spewing such complete misinformation?
July 18, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterIIU
Wry:
My prediction: It will end in new elections.
July 18, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterIIU
IIU,

You might be right. The new election might make things worse, no matter how it turned out.

Scenario 1: Regions gets a bigger slice: This is a real threat. I sense the people want order and stability, and will respond favorably to Yanu's promise of "put us in charge and we'll stop this mess."
Scenario 2: The Oranges win a narrow majority. This leaves a badly divided nation with a resentful east that now feels that it was cheated out of the chance to govern.
Not good either way.
July 18, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterWRY
RFE/RL Newsline reports:
The pro-presidential Our Ukraine bloc announced on July 18 that it accepts the legitimacy of the "anti-crisis" coalition, international media reported.
----------

Sounds to me like there's still a healthy hope for that victory for democracy, WRY & IIU. (Hope so!)
July 18, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterR. Smith
I can only hope that BYU and NSNU going into opposition is the best thing that has happened so far for the Yusch presidency. It'll shake him out of his complacency and make him more concerned for his legacy...

dlw
July 18, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterdlw
Wry, I agree with your scenarions re: elections esp. the first as all those votes who voted for political parties which did not make the threshhold will go voting Regions (ie. Putin's politics, Vitrenko, etc). I would not like to see new elections as the people voted already and made their positions clear plus it only delays the inevitable.
July 19, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterIIU
Dan, Remember your NATO pitch? and the get the word out article in Kyiv Post?, well the following could have been written by yourself,

"The enormity of the anti-NATO reaction pointed out an increasingly obvious fact, i.e. that talk in the halls of power about NATO accession had almost no support in the form of a seriously intensive, widespread and effective pro-NATO information campaign. Suddenly, the top levels of government in Kyiv, Brussels, London and Washington understood that they had not just dropped the ball, but they didn't even know where the ball was or how to play it. Whether or not this miscalculation can be overcome in the near future is very much in doubt." by Olesya Oleshko from "The Summer of Our Discontent" article in July 2006 issue of Ukraine Observer http://www.ukraine-observer.com/articles/221/881
July 19, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterIIU
Why is Yanukoych's breaking of the rules legitimate and Yushchenko's strong arming illegitimate?

And the assumption that Yanu will improve the economy is absurd.
July 20, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterblackminorca
I think http://foreignnotes.blogspot.com/2006/07/theatricals-in-vr-and-some-speculation.html
has made a good call that Yusch will not submit Yanu as PM but he won't dissolve the Parliament either and Yekhanurov will continue acting as PM.

My question comes down to whether there will be more stability than recently finally.

I also wonder whether Yusch will be able to strong-arm some more influence to give him a chance to redeem himself. I'd like to think this whole experience would be a splash of cold water for him.

dlw
July 20, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterdlw
Lalulu: Hey! You're back. And still saying the same things you always have. I mean, I could point you to what the protesters were actually fighting for, but, hey, if you ignored them before you'll keep doing it. Might as well link for the record, though:

http://orangeukraine.squarespace.com/stories/2004/12/15/tent-city-people.html

WRY: "I think Ukraine is at a crossroads: we either have a fuinctioning parliament that has majority and opposition, or else we go down the road that leads to the shelling of parliament a la Yeltsin in Russia."

Oh, I don't think it will come to military intervention or any other similar extreme situation. All logic suggests that Yushchenko should acknowledge the RoU-SPU-CPU coaltion, so I'm mostly just crossing my fingers in the hopes that he behaves in at least a slightly reasonable way. No guarantees, when a reasonable man would have dropped Poroshenko months ago, but I have hope.

IIU: Hey, that does look like my NATO argument. Well, anyway. We'll see.

blackminorca: oof. I'm exhausted, I promise I'll get to your issues tomorrow.
July 20, 2006 | Registered CommenterDan McMinn
Well, now we have Yushchenko playing Mickey Mouse games about Yanukovych's application. Seems Yanu didn't file his CV:

Yushchenko: Hey, Andrei, ever heard of this guy? Yanu - let me take another look. Oh, Yanuko-vych, I think it says.

Andrei: Sounds kinda familiar. What's he want?

Yushchenko: He wants to be prime minister! But look, what do we know about this guy? Seems like I used to hear about him on the news. Was he one of the presenters on Channel 5? No? Hmm. I KNOW I've heard about him somehow. Ya - nu - ko - vych. Yanukovych. Gee, I'm trying to place him. Big guy, wasn't he? Was he a professor of some kind? Seems like I heard that on the Maidan sometime.

Andrei: Dunno.

Yushchenko: Oh well, never mind. Doesn't matter. Hey look, can you catch the phones for an hour or two? I gotta go check on my bees.

Andrei: See ya.

July 21, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterWRY
Now for my serious comment. Dan, I think logic would dictate what you say, but we seem to have gone far beyond logic in the Ukrainian summer of 2006. To me, it looks like we're heading toward some kind of brinksmanship:
--Yushchenko is going to stall on Yanu's application and not submit it on some technicality.
--Regions is going to try to place Yanu in the PM slot without Yushchenko's approval. Regions will block the podium and otherwise make the Rada inaccessible to anyone who objects to this scenario.
--Yush will declare time for a new election, but Regions will say they already have a functioning Rada and PM.

And that really does bring us to the threshold of Yeltsin and the Russian Duma in '93.
July 21, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterWRY
Oh, let me change that a little. Yush won't call for new elections because it would be political suicide for the Oranges if Regions went along. Instead, he'll say that because no valid PM has been submitted that Yekhanurov continues in the post (Yush will say that just because he CAN dissolve the Rada July 25, doesn't mwean he HAS to). Regions disagrees and puts in a blockade, etc etc.
At some point either Yush storms the Rada to get 'em out or maybe Putin decides at that point to invade the Crimea and send in troops to support the "rightsof Russian speakers."
Snakes on a plane!
July 21, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterWRY
blackminorca: Ok, I'm back.

"Why is Yanukoych's breaking of the rules legitimate and Yushchenko's strong arming illegitimate?"

Those weren't the words I used. The ones that I applied here are these: "RoU was able to use it's noise as a filibuster until it could reach a deal with the Socialists. NU and BYT don't even seem to be trying to win them back, so of what use is the agitation?"

Disruptions in the Rada based on noise are not illegitimate, I definitely think they have every right to be shocked and angered at Moroz's surprise switch. My concern was that they had no goal. Nor do I think Yushchenko is "strong-arming", rather he is "stalling". That's fine, even though I'm nervous in the interum, so long as he eventually acknowledges Yanukovych's premiership. My reasoning is above.

"And the assumption that Yanu will improve the economy is absurd."

I didn't assume that, either. My justifications were prefaced by "might", "give a chance", and "at least a chance". The point being that with no government but Yekhanurov's interum one, nothing's going to get done, and if anything did happen, it would be of questionable legitimacy in the eyes of the public.

I did title this "the second worst government".

On second thought, I should have said third worst: worst is new elections with even more Yanu, second worst is an attempt like the one WRY talks about in which Yekhanurov is held on in a questionable continued interum government. Letting the RoU-SPU-CPU coalition take the Cabinet at least establishes a steady state from which decisions can actually be made.

I actually think positive movement on the WTO is highly unlikely. I didn't make that clear enough above. But there is at least the potential for positive movement.

Do you have counterarguments (and alternatives) to any of my specific points? I'd love to hear them.

WRY: Hilarous dialogue there. I like it.

Everybody: I've linked this comment stream in the next entry, thanks for contributing.
July 21, 2006 | Registered CommenterDan McMinn
There's some interesting posts at Zerkalo right now.
http://www.mirror-weekly.com/nn/index/606/

I imagine that if Yusch keeps stalling on Yanu becoming PM so Yekhanurov can keep the job that it will restore some balance of power and pave the way for a broader coalition.

dlw
July 21, 2006 | Unregistered Commenterdlw
dlw: thanks for the heads-up. As you can see, I agree with you about those links, I've used the top two in the next entry.
July 21, 2006 | Registered CommenterDan McMinn

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.