Free at Last
A warm fuzzy from the Washington Post on Sunday: (I got it via the Action Ukraine Report) God bless Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, a solid, smart-set group of Ukrainian nationalists. He does a good job of expressing the kind of euphoria people have been feeling around here, in ways I just couldn't. I thought it would make a nice counterpoint to my attempts at piecing apart opposing arguments.
"FROM A DREAM TO THE STREETS OF KYIV"
We cast a vote for freedom
OUTLOOK SECTION: COMMENTARY:
By Myroslava Antonovych, Kiev, Ukraine
The Washington Post, Washington, D.C.
Sunday, December 5, 2004; Page B01
KIEV
- Ever since my childhood, first in the Dnipropetrovsk region of
eastern Ukraine and later in the Lviv region of the west, I have
dreamed about a miracle -- although back then I did not realize what
shape my dream might eventually take. My recurrent vision was of a time
when all Ukrainians -- from the west and the east, from the north and
the south -- would come together as a single nation.
For the
past two weeks, I have been joining demonstrations in Kiev's
Independence Square together with my students and colleagues, filled
with optimism that my dream is at last becoming reality. Ukrainians
from Kiev and
Lviv, from Kharkiv and Odesa stand united in our
opposition to acting Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych and in our belief
that the presidential election was rigged in his favor to prevent the
election of the people's choice,
Viktor Yushchenko.
The
people were determined not to leave the streets until the election was
overturned, and we didn't. Now the Ukrainian Supreme Court has ordered
a rerun of the second round. Everybody feels that we are privileged to
play a role in this pivotal moment in our country's history. We dare to
hope that we are witnessing the logical culmination of our country's
1,000-year struggle for true independence and unity.
To
understand this feeling, you must first understand a little of our
history of division. My country has been divided from the 9th century
onward, both by outer enemies and inner traitors, so that until
recently my dream seemed a mere mirage. Our periods of independence,
such as that of the Ukrainian People's Republic from 1918-1919, were so
short that people hardly had time to know what it meant.
My mom
used to tell me that when the Nazis occupied Lviv in 1941, it took them
only days to smother independence, which had recently been proclaimed
by Ukraine's nationalists. After that the Nazis started to arrest
people and take them to Germany. Those very short periods of
independence were never completely peaceful, so all the population's
energy went into combating outside invaders. Little energy was left to
build or even speculate about a common Ukrainian future.
For
the first time in our history, Ukraine has now experienced 13 years of
peace. Our rebirth began in 1991, when our parliament declared our
country no longer part of the Soviet Union. Symbolically, the official
name of our capital is now Kyiv, which is a close reflection of how we
Ukrainians pronounce it, rather than Kiev, which is how it sounds in
Russian.
Throughout those 13 years, a few oligarchs have robbed
their own people by privatizing factories, all the time reassuring us
that we are fortunate to be living in peace -- and we came to accept
that as a significant achievement, because Ukrainians know full well
that poverty is nothing in comparison with war. And the period of peace
bore fruit. With the support of the international community and
non-governmental organizations, we have begun to develop a civil
society in Ukraine. As a result, hundreds of Ukrainian and
international human rights organizations have worked actively and
consistently to advocate human rights, freedom of the press and the rule
of law here.
Having
benefited from the Pylyp Orlyk Constitution of 1710 -- a Ukrainian
document that was one of the first in the world to define standards of
political and legal thought and to create a division of powers -- as
well as the 1918 Constitution of the Ukrainian People's Republic, which
established broad rights and liberties, Ukrainians were bound to be
democratically minded. So it was only natural that we should rise in
opposition last month when we realized that our right to choose our
president in a free and fair election had been so rudely violated.
In
truth, this uprising has turned out to be fabulous. Can you imagine
being part of an uprising alive with the sunny smiles and sparkling
eyes of those who rose in protest? Can you imagine young girls
presenting flowers to
soldiers as they stand with shields in front
of the demonstrators? Can you believe that people have actually been
giving food and warm clothes to supporters of Yanukovych who were
brought into Kiev by special buses and trains?
Yes, all these
miracles have been taking place in Ukraine for the past two weeks, and
we call it the "Orange Revolution." Ribbons on our sleeves, on our hats
and even on our trousers, ribbons tied to our cars and around our trees
and even ribbons on pets have turned our country orange -- a symbol of
our desire to break with our past and move toward Europe rather than
fall back into the Kremlin's orbit.
People on the streets here
are still very excited even though they are tired and understandably
cautious. They are no longer scared of Ukrainian policemen or soldiers,
who will never fight their own people, to whom they have sworn an oath
of allegiance.
Some people suspect that Russian detachments may
be used against the demonstrators. Everybody knows that Russia's
interference in Ukrainian elections was huge. Russian President
Vladimir Putin demonstrated his support of Yanukovych before the
elections and was the first to congratulate him on his victory. His
heavy-handedness did not work. Even so, Ukrainian President Leonid
Kuchma has flown again and again to meet with Putin and nobody doubts
that the aim is to consult the Russian president about what to do next
-- telephone conversations are no longer considered safe.
People
are sure that separatist rumblings in eastern Ukraine were scripted
with Russian help. But they failed even so. After the separatists made
their declarations, many people who had always been pro-Russian started
to say that they do not want to live in Russia after all. We are left
wondering why Kuchma does not consult with us, instead of going to
Putin -- he is still being given a chance to avoid being cursed by his
own people.
I know that all democracies have experienced periods
in their history similar to the one we are experiencing. The Czechs,
the Lithuanians, the East Germans and other former communist subjects
went through them more than a decade ago, and now their countries are
all members of the European Union. Ukraine's future is in Europe, and
the EU has already given a signal that once free democratic elections
are held and the results not falsified, Ukraine will get its chance to
become an EU member.
One of the provocative arguments made
against Yushchenko throughout the presidential campaign was that he is
pro-American, that the United States has been financing his campaign,
thus advancing its own agenda here. In response, Yushchenko repeated
the words of the famous Ukrainian poet Vasyl Symonenko, who was a
victim of the Soviet regime: "Let America and Russia keep silence when
I talk to you, Ukraine."
True, the United States has extended
financial aid to Ukraine over the last 13 years of our independence,
but I don't see this as having been done for nefariously self-serving
reasons. Even when the U.S. government cut financial support to
Ukrainian governmental projects, it continued to support the
non-governmental sector and the academic exchanges of professors and
students, thus financing the development of freedom in Ukraine.
I
have profited myself, traveling to the United States and learning there
about the rule of law. Unlike Russia, which has always acted
surreptitiously, the United States never made a secret of its actions.
I think first of all about how in America, the government basically
gets permission for this support from its own citizens -- the taxpayers.
On
Friday, in my office, we hugged, congratulated each other and wiped
away each other's tears when we heard that the Supreme Court had
annulled the runoff election results. Similar expressions of jubilation
burst out among the tens of thousands of demonstrators in Independence
Square, and fireworks crackled in the night sky. The new vote will take
place on Dec. 26.
We know that this is not the end, that
difficult weeks lie ahead. But for the first time, we believe that we
the people can do something without having to follow a script, no
matter who wrote it. This is the will of the people, who have chosen
freedom. -30-
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Myroslava
Antonovych, a professor of international law at Kyiv-Mohyla Academy,
was a Fulbright scholar in 1996 at the Urban Morgan Human Rights
Institute of the University of Cincinnati College of Law.
Author's e-mail: mma@iatp.kiev.ua

Reader Comments (12)
May it also be the will of God... and, I'll bet that it is.
Take a look at the live webcam from 1plus1.com.ua
The interface here won't swallow a normal html link for this one, for some reason... but it translates the full URL as a link - click and enjoy...
http://www.1plus1.com.ua/video/camera.php
(DAN - remove this if it does not open a new page to view - i.e., causing having to use go-back and enlargement of window to return to comments...)
http://192.117.226.16/frame.jpg
This link forces a new window... Use reload, to show the next available images.
See:
http://www.1plus1.com.ua/
for source and their somewhat slower java interface.
This is Suman, from steadyblogging.com. Thanks for the comment you posted on Friday. I appreciate the background info about the chestnuts, and also the links. I also appreciate that you posted this WP essay. I will have to link to it. BTW, my younger sister is in Kiev this year on a Fulbright, and so I hope to visit Kiev in in the coming year.
The success of any revolution is based on its results and right now there are a substantial number of people convinced of various conspiracies and threats that await them in the event of a Yushchenko win.
I've seen dismissals of such issues with an "us against them" mindset. For Ukraine to become a vital and successful country, those old ways of thinking must be replaced with respect and appreciation for variety. Ukraine must be about "Us".
I had dinner with a local family two nights and here are some of the stories I was told: Yulia Timoshenko stated on television that the people of Nikolaev would be driven from their homes and their fingers would be cut off, the US is conspiring to take over Ukraine, Russian speakers will become second class citizens and face violence as well as prison, Russian citizens will be deported.
I could go on. As i said before, as crazy and paranoid as these beliefs are to me, they are held by a lot of people. They didn't come up with these ideas all by themselves. And they are not stupid.
If Yushchenko wants to eventually lead this country effectively, he has to begin a program of directly addressing these fears. If he doesn't, Ukraine will face even greater troubles in the coming years.
Of course your friends aren't crazy, they just don't have any decent news. At least from their statements, the opposition intends to do what you suggest. I am referring to the statement here: http://www.ua.org.ua/en/news/4751/
Yushchenko uses mostly emotional arguments - for two reasons.
1) The crowd won't listen to common sense, it needs emotions. I did try to argue with orange people - most of them are students or unemployed, and a good half is drunk, so they can hardly say anything but a few slogans and menaces, they won't listen to words, which is a bad sign... I hear one emphatical girl saying in subway: "I hate this criminal who will torture and kill me for just 2 hrivnas" -- this must be a loyal propaganda, no doubt...
2) He has only few facts in use, as he himself is stained beyond his head, as he messed with IMF credits and has a series of dirty tricks which I can tell you if you ask me. I'm no politician, so I may be unaware about some more, but what I heard is pretty enough for me -- I'm disgusted when two thieves (he and Timoshenko) pretend to save the nation from the third one (who is by no means better -- I will not deny his frauds and crimes!) -- they just scared the crowd to death, constantly pretending that somebody beweaponed comes to fight them (I heard 4 times such stuff), that Yanukovich is bad and will ruin Ukraine (while he was doing just the opposite while being the Prime Minister), - these two folks are saint, yeah. They can say only threats and slogans, they are responsible for nothing now -- because left without posts, and when doing nothing criticism is quite easy :)
So -- will you correct this situation? You're fighting on one side and do not wish to look for other opinions. Fortunately, you still accept comments. So far... :(
Yushchenko uses what emotional fervor he can muster at rallies because they are rallies. Their whole purpose is to get likeminded people excited about something. Bands do not give concerts to reach out to new audiences; they do it to get people excited who already like them. Same principle.
I find is extremely strange that you consider Yushchenko a populist speaker without substance. He is a banker. I have never seen a more mild-mannered person in my life, the only time I've ever heard him speak in a moving emotional way was in front of Parliament after he was poisoned. He has made the following campaign promises: pull the troops out of Iraq, crack down on corruption, especially by powerful oligarchs, set Ukraine on a stable economic path, guide Ukraine towards greater cooperation with the EU and NATO, and more. He also has a political history from which you can see his actual views: his promotion of direct use of Odesa-Brody, his opposition to the Krivorizhstal privatization, his promotion, as PM, of repayment of oil debts to Russia, his crackdown on cheaters tapping the pipes, as his promotion of rational fiscal and economic policy. His chief strength is rational fiscal and economic policy. He is the exact opposite of a firebrand.
I have heard nothing about conflicts with the IMF, I would be very interested to hear what it is you refer to, please send me a link and I promise to look at it.
Yushchenko was poisoned, and the main suspect is the administration. In addition, opposition news outlets have been shut down or even firebombed and opposition allies detained without explanation. Yushchenko's campaign was constantly subject to power outages, the refusal of landing rights and more. You do not deny that the results of the election were fraudulent, but there is more than that. The fraud was perpetrated by government agencies acting on the behest of Yanukovych's supporters and the evidence for this is on tapes collected by the SBU. These are crimes and some of them are violent -- why shouldn't the opposition speak of the administration as violent?
Those opposition supporters, half of whom look drunk to you, have responded to violent and illegal behavior on the part of the government by holding a peaceful rally in which there was not one violent incident in two and a half weeks. Where is the moral equivalency with the administration?
On the topic of drunkenness, I have just not seen more than a handful of drunken people. There's not much we can do but disagree.
Opinions I will listen to, but the opinions I give credence to will be the ones supported by evidence.
About "populist without substance" - point by point:
1) pull out the troops from Iraq? Nonsense, if you're so attentive to our elections and political processes, you could notice that THE WHOLE Yushchenko block voted AGAINST pulling the troops out there, it's true.
2) crack down on corruption? this you await from the persons from Lazarenko's team (you know the name? he stole $200 million) and Lazarenko is - from jail in America - writing in Yushchenko support! http://hotline.net.ua/content/view/6653/37/ After this - yeah, a great corruption fighter, Mr. Yushchenko... He may be not a bad man himself, but the interests he represents are as dirty as the other side's ones.
3) Set Ukraine on the stable economic path? good WORDS. Everybody promised this - you can see the result...
4) cooperation with EU and NATO? Two things. First - not everybody is keen to get there. Second - nobody there will accept us any time soon. That was about "populism". You will agree that my arguments also have some factual strength, not only promises and emotions, unlike Yushchenko's. I hate him for telling: "Each day you're standing there you win higher pensions and various social benefits!" - only a very... hum... naive person could trust such stuff, as our economy was losing millions a day because of this bunch of "opposition" politicians left without their posts. This I call exactly populism.
About his political figure - you know, unfortunately, I can give you as many contras as you gave me pros. I know about this bloody Yulya's involvement with stealing money for gas and energy, as the prices got skyhigh then, and my mother-in-law had eventually the gas and electricity cut out from the house IN WINTER - for sure, there must be a very humane political reason for this ruthless move...
He did not want to pay the miners, debts for electricity were growing almost as fast as tariffs, and - he was removed from the PM post when he decided to stockpile somebody's used-out nuclear fuel in Donbass mines (guess that was the least populated area in Ukraine, yeah), and other stuff I cannot unfortunately confirm with documents - but as many facts against Yanukovich are based on mere words... And - everybody trusts them - because he is at power, so he is the bad one, responsible for the whole situation, - but his opponents are only "good" because they do nothing and have nothing to account for!
As I have already told - I do not deny Yanukovich is mafia, and I will not deny or support his actions you wrote about, the only thing that is moving me in my protests is that - his opponent, also a typical mafia man, is hailed to be the main democrat of the country. I hate such democracy, which in fact is just another mafia clan in disguise.
Alex
1) Do you have an article link on the views ofthe oppostion? Because I have this Yahoo link saying opposition deputies took aside time during the no-confidence vote to also make a symbolic vote to pull troops out of Iraq: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/20041203/ap_on_re_eu/ukraine_iraq. The opposition guys say this is just symbolism, but 257/290 in favor of pulling troops is a lot more than none.
I also have this article from Al Jezeera that says Yushchenko wants to get troops out so long as the withdrawal isn't hasty: (sorry I don't have a better source offhand) http://www.aljazeera.com/me.asp?service_ID=5869
2) The fact that Lazarenko says he is for Yushchenko is as immaterial. He is in the US and in prison. Where is your evidence that he is a major supporter of Yushchenko?
3) So you're saying because Kuchma's regime has failed to deliver on its promises to Ukraine, you will vote for his chosen successor?
4) I said "cooperate" not "join" for a reason. Of course many people don't like joining NATO or the EU, they still are good long term goals. Yushchenko's side has never argued that Ukraine will be joining the EU soon, but it could get into NATO and the WTO fairly soon. Those would have economic benefits, so he can truthfully say that the lack of movement towards them has hampered Ukraine's economy.
5) The economy is losing millions because the government stole the election, paid for it with 300 million dollars of Ukrainian money and 300 million of Russian money, paid out one big massive check to pensioners right before the election, promised more big payouts, and THEN the opposition objected. The opposition acted because the administration committed fraud. You'd rather have the President steal the election?
6) You don't know anything of the sort about Tymoshenko with certainty, because this is all part of the grey economy that we can only speculate about because EVERYTHING got stolen in the 1990s. If she is as bad an oligarch as you say, why is she agitating with an opposition that has gotten her in jail and isolated, instead of sticking with much more comfortable, unmolested oligarchs like Akhmetov?
7) Are you telling me that Yushchenko is worse than Yanukovych because people love him; many people don't even think he's a crook? You say he's crooked, you say you have evidence, I haven't seen it yet. Show me.
I'm tired to argue in writing. Only don't say anything good about Timoshenko, she's a dirty thing left without power, so she's joined the party left without power like her. She's te king of politician I hate the most : the one left witohout her share of the power.
You know, when you were not here yet (so you can hardly dispute my words about this period) - I came to Lugansk to one friend of mine. It was 1995, and the overall corruption was probably at its top. We had a very long talk with his mother who - in the middle of her speach - made a striking conclusion to which I fully agreed. Speaking about that time, she said: being rich is INDECENT now. And Yulya was rich in 90-s. The only people to be rich then were thieves - direct or indirect. So - this is my truth, and you cannot argue with me on this field, for I know lots and lots more about the time you were somewhere else, but not here.
People - al lest those who are able to say anything except "nas bagato" - don't love him (Yushchenko), you're wrong or misinformed. They vote for him because they think, naive creatures, he will get rid of corruption, unlike Yanukovich. Nobody told me that Yushchenko himself is a good president, so - please, don't try to distort my words...
Unfortunately, I cannot give you any links about voting Iraq matter - I heard it on TV...
heck, you call Inernet links an "evidence" :) ok, I will take this into consideration. By the way, I love one article which will be a perfect "evidence", I have already posted the link, and I'm posting it once more
http://www.worldpress.org/Europe/1987.cfm
read this. This an Indian diplomat - nor Russian, neither American. And I call this the truth - and you will have to recognize that this is, at least, a viewpoint from a disinterested observer.
Have fun, Dan.
I appreciate - really - your passion with which you defend the "democracy" in Ukraine and support the fighters for "freedom". But - try to be serious, don't repeat after the TV or newspapers - they are all on somebody's side, so - try to make your own analysis.
As for the links - I've found these within only half an hour, if you want any more, write on my email, I'm quitting your site for good.
http://crimealine.tik.com.ua/2004/12/1007.html
http://www.uatop.com.ua/?id=19426&part=all&action=1010&day=21&month=12&year=2001
http://ua-pravda.com/dioksin131204.shtml
http://ua-pravda.com/zapadvostok261104.shtml
http://ua-pravda.com/revolution281104.shtml
http://ua-pravda.com/chtosdelal141204.shtml
http://www.korrespondent.net/main/109288
http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=4072
http://left.ru/2004/17/bossaut116.phtml
fare well. Don't be blind